Readers, Welcome to my blog (formerly Birds, Blooms, Books, etc). I'm entering a new decade taking on the challenge of moving from Maryland after living there 46 years and learning about my new home here in New England in the Live Free or Die state - New Hampshire. Join me as a write this new chapter of my life.

Monday, November 10, 2025

 Keeping you informed but still not doing any more than that as my hiatus continues.

Lawless Enforcement

The feds are out of control

MAGA Republicans have done more than any political movement to undermine public respect for and confidence in law enforcement. Under the auspices of a 34-times convicted felon, the MAGA movement has condoned violent insurrection and cheered the pardon of the Jan. 6 vicious mob that killed and maimed police officers. So much for “Back the Blue.”

Over the last 10 months, Donald Trump (with full consent of Republican patsies on the Hill) has refused to prosecute white collar crimes and crypto swindlers, putting Americans’ finances at risk and our government up for sale. Worse, we have seen federal law enforcement persistently abusing power, assaulting unarmed people, misleading courts, and playing hapless victim. None of this engenders respect for the rule of law or support for enforcement personnel.

Trump’s federal immigration goons, who were supposed to deport the worst of the worst criminals, have become rogue bullies. Increasingly, federal judges have proven that they’ve had enough of lawless enforcement and illegal detention of both immigrants and, in some cases, U.S. citizens.

In Chicago last week, U.S. District Court Judge Sara Ellis, after days of testimony documenting Customs and Border Patrol abuse, cracked down hard on its repeated violations of her TRO. WBEZ in Chicago reported:

Federal agents’ use of force amid an aggressive deportation campaign in Chicago “shocks the conscience,” the Trump administration’s arguments “lack credibility,” and a top Border Patrol official lied while trying to justify the use of tear gas, a judge found Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis made those findings while handing down a preliminary injunction that now more permanently restricts federal authorities use of force during the campaign known as “Operation Midway Blitz.” It largely mirrors an earlier order from Ellis, forbidding agents from using “riot control” weapons against people who pose no immediate threat, and without two warnings.

Judge Ellis also observed that the head of the Chicago CBP operation, Gregory Bovino, “admitted that he lied about whether a rock hit him before he deployed tear gas in Little Village.”

She bluntly also accused the Trump regime of lying about the city:

From Aurora to Cicero, and Chicago to Evanston to Waukegan. This is a vibrant place, brimming with vitality and hope. Striving to move forward from its complicated history. The [Trump administration] would have people believe, instead, that the Chicagoland area is in a vice hold of violence, ransacked by rioters and attacked by agitators. That simply is untrue. And the government’s own evidence in this case belies that assertion.

To any honest observer, the lawbreakers are the ones defying the judge’s orders, testifying falsely under oath, and assaulting residents who pose no threat to them.

Photo by Paul Goyette from Chicago, USA

Federal personnel charged with detaining suspected immigration law violators did not fare any better in the courtroom of Judge Robert Gettleman, who heard compelling testimony last week about mistreatment, disreputable conditions, and chaos at the Broadview processing facility, which was never intended to be used to house detainees for an extended time.

Gettleman described treatment of detainees at the facility as “unnecessarily cruel.” He heard horrific first-hand accounts of vile conditions and denial of access to counsel for detainees. “Sleeping shoulder to shoulder next to filthy toilets that are overflowing, surrounded by human waste,” the judge said. “It’s just unacceptable.”

Capitol News Illinois reported that immigrants testified “they were pressured to sign voluntary deportation forms in order to escape the facility’s overcrowded and filthy conditions.” Making conditions unbearable to force self-deportation appears to be a feature, not a bug of Trump immigration enforcement.

Gettleman dressed down the government: 

“People shouldn’t be sleeping next to overflowing toilets. They shouldn’t be sleeping on top of each other. They shouldn’t be sleeping in plastic chairs. They shouldn’t be sleeping on concrete floors.”

He issued a TRO to force the facility to provide such basic items as clean bedding, potable water, and (every other day) showers.

Photo by Paul Goyette from Chicago, USA

Broadview has become a symbol of cruelty and recklessness. After both these rulings, “Sheriff’s deputies removed a group of 14 suburban moms, as they call themselves, who were sitting in a circle in the middle of the road outside of the Broadview Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility as a symbol of civil disobedience on Friday,” the local ABC TV station reported. “Moms from across the western suburbs… are demanding an end to the ‘campaign of chaos.’”

As authorities began to arrest the group of women, another took up the microphone to denounce arrest of protestors who had “exercised their First Amendment Rights in opposition to what this government is doing to our communities.” She implored the feds: “Stop abducting our community members. Stop separating families.” MAGA thugs’ war on Chicago residents and the responses from residents and courts will continue so long as the regime insists on brutalizing the city.

Share

From the horrendous to the farcical, we have also witnessed the “sub”-version of serious law enforcement: the case of the “exploding” sandwich, where taxpayer dollars and court time were chewed up for no good reason.

Sean Dunn, the “sandwich” guy who dared to hurl a projectile (fully-loaded with onions and condiments) at Border Patrol Officer Greg Lairmore was found not guilty by a jury in a half-baked misdemeanor trial. D.C. prosecutors previously failed to indict Dunn on a felony charge—leaving us to conclude that indicting a ham sandwich is easier than indicting a sandwich thrower).

The jury did not swallow Lairmore ludicrous testimony that the sandwich “exploded” on impact. “I could feel the impact through my bulletproof vest,” he testified. (Was his vest was made of tissue paper?) In all fairness, the Trump flunkies in the D.C. U.S. attorney’s office are ones responsible for the display of whining. So desperate to punish a D.C. resident objecting to occupation of his city, the government attorneys wound up with egg on their faces.

Mockery is critical to undermining fascism but that does not detract from the serious damage to the integrity, reputation, and effectiveness of federal law enforcement in this regime. Trump has turned their personnel, undertrained and poorly lead, into a national embarrassment. When not whimpering over costumed protestors or a sandwich assailant, they regularly incur the ire of courts for their abusive and cruel conduct as well as dishonest testimony. Their incompetence is roundly mocked. Trump is sending the worst of the worst.

The situation cries out for congressional oversight, but MAGA House members are in hiding for fear they might be forced to vote on release of the complete Epstein files. As MAGA Republicans abet a cover-up and condone widespread abusive conduct, Americans are left with very little law or order.

The Contrarian is reader-supported. Please join the pro-democracy movement and help us ensure that cruel lawlessness is held to account, by becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Saturday, November 8, 2025

From Americans of Conscience Founder

 Signs of Renewal in a Weary Nation

Pop quiz! Do you know what a municipal election is?

  1. An election that doesn’t include voting for federal candidates.
  2. Statistically, the election type with the lowest voter turnout.
  3. An opportunity to elect candidates whose roles affect our daily lives.
  4. All of the above.

Notable Turnout for Municipal Elections

We’ve all heard the phrase “vote down ballot,” but American voters really took heed in our most recent election cycle. Normally, municipal elections have much lower turnout. Yet in New York City this week, more than two million people turned out to vote in a mayoral election for the first time since 1969. In cities such as MinneapolisCharlotte, and Cincinnati, competitive local contests brought renewed civic attention to city councils and school boards. States like VirginiaCalifornia, and Georgia broke records for municipal (non-presidential and non-midterm) voting. This reflects an encouraging truth: Americans are showing up.

This matters. At a time when national political agendas are overwhelming, this week’s elections remind us that democracy’s heartbeat is local. Even in a time of fatigue and mistrust toward national politics, millions of Americans showed up this week to cast votes that shape our communities for the better.

Federal elections get extensive media coverage, funding, and turnout, but have a more diffuse impact on our lives. When it comes to the essentials of daily life—clean water, roads, parks, libraries, zoning, and emergency services—policies become personal. Local change also happens faster. And we don’t just vote for people, we vote for repaired roads, reopening a voting center, fairer tax policy, and better school funding. Voters like you and me showing up for local elections means decisions are made in ways that are more responsive to community needs.

Celebrating Leadership Firsts

This week, voters elected a new generation of leaders who reflect the communities they serve. These results mark historic “firsts” that deserve celebration for expanding the scope of representation in American democracy. 

In Virginia, Abigail Spanberger became the state’s first woman elected governor. Her victory was joined by Ghazala Hashmi, the first Muslim woman ever elected to statewide office in the United States, now serving as Virginia’s lieutenant governor. Jay Jones made history as Virginia’s first Black attorney general

Voters in New York City chose Zohran Mamdani as their next mayor—the city’s first Muslim, first South Asian, and youngest leader in more than a century. In Detroit, Mary Sheffield became both the first woman and the first Black woman to lead her city, another sign of the steady widening of the democratic circle.

These wins are milestones for justice, reminding us that good government should be by the people and for the people. Local elections tend to favor white and wealthy candidates. But our nation is stronger when our leaders reflect the diversity and experiences in our communities–and when those leaders follow through on voter mandates to take on issues that have previously been minimized or ignored by those in power. 

Keep Showing Up

If we can take one insight from these most recent municipal elections, it’s the importance of voting as a way to use your voice–from the highest level of office to the “dog catcher.” Each ballot cast is a quiet act of hope. A commitment to meeting our neighbors’ needs, not just our own. 

Every time we vote, we’re deciding that a better future is worth working for. Thank you for showing up.

“And while we cast our ballots alone, we chose hope together.”
~ Zohran Mamdani, NYC Mayor-Elect


*****

Still on a hiatus from reading and commenting.

Friday, November 7, 2025

Undaunted Leaders

Many outstanding candidates, one daring governor

I enjoyed an embarrassment of riches when choosing the Undaunted person of this epic week. Virginia-Gov. Elect Abigail Spanberger waged a near-perfect race, clobbering her opponent by 15 points, and pulling the rest of the ticket (including 13 House of Delegate pickups) into office on her voluminous coattails. New Jersey-Gov. Elect Mikie Sherrill embarrassed pollsters who saw the race as nip and tuck, rolling up a 13-point win. Both defied the pundit narrative that Democrats had permanently “lost” young people and Hispanic voters.

Certainly, New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani ran an historic race, demonstrating brilliant social media skills, electrifying younger voters, and showing Democrats (no matter their ideological profile) how to run on affordability and against the oligarchy (including the most corrupt and cruelest among them, Donald Trump). Mamdani’s victory speech was inspirational and witty (to Trump: “Turn the volume up”; to Andrew Cuomo: “Let tonight be the final time I utter his name”). The thrust of his remarks could be a model message for many candidates:

And while we cast our ballots alone, we chose hope together. Hope over tyranny. Hope over big money and small ideas. Hope over despair. We won because New Yorkers allowed themselves to hope that the impossible could be made possible. And we won because we insisted that no longer would politics be something that is done to us. Now, it is something that we do. …

New York will remain a city of immigrants: a city built by immigrants, powered by immigrants and, as of tonight, led by an immigrant.

So hear me, President Trump, when I say this: To get to any of us, you will have to get through all of us.

But when it comes to political daring, foresight, strategy, and undaunted grit, California Gov. Gavin Newsom beat Trump at his own game and changed the 2026 landscape. He saw Trump’s Texas power grab for what it was—a desperate attempt to rig the midterms that Republicans know will be a disaster if they are held to account for the chaos, cruelty, and corruption they have enabled.

Despite skeptics and many Democrats tut-tutting about adhering to norms (even when Republicans have burned the rule book), Newsom was determined to counteract Trump’s Texas gambit. When few thought there was an adequate response to Trump, he (along with Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi) championed and put on the ballot Prop. 50. He gave Californians an opportunity to balance out Trump’s 5-seat grab in Texas with a new California map that could give Democrats five new seats of their own.

The results were spectacular. Prop. 50 won by almost 30 points with robust turnout for a ballot with a single item on it. The “Yes” vote won every demographic group (aside from Republicans and conservatives). It was especially popular among younger voters.

Newsom celebrated the win in a press appearance Tuesday. “What a nightfor the Democratic Party. A party that is in its ascendancy,” he began. “A party that is on its toes, no longer on its heels. From coast to coast, sea to shining sea,” he said. “But it was not just a victory tonight for the Democratic Party, it was a victory for the United States of America, for the people of this country, and the principles our Founding Fathers lived and died for.”

Newsom warned that Trump’s efforts to rig the elections “carry to this day,” citing his effort to “militarize our streets” and change maps in more states. Stressing that the Prop. 50 campaign was a “90 day sprint” to win, he recalled that Trump sent his shock troops to the Prop. 50 kick-off event and again on Tuesday to Dodger Stadium to intimidate voters. None of Trump’s tactics succeeded. (Republicans have filed suit to try to undo the Prop. 50 victory.)

Although Newsom relished in taking on Trump (“after poking the bear, this bear roared”), his tone was sober and serious, his message direct. He urged other states to join the fight, promising Democrats could effectively end the Trump presidency as soon as “Speaker Hakeem Jeffries” is sworn in.

“We need the state of Virginia,” he said. “We need the state of Maryland. We need our friends in New York, in Illinois, in Colorado — we need to see other states, with their remarkable leaders, that have been doing remarkable things, to meet this moment head-on as well.”

Newsom has gotten well-deserved credit for skewering Trump on social media and defying his efforts to abscond with California’s national guard. But in fighting fire with fire and taking up the challenge to preserve Democrats’ hopes for a midterm victory, he showed Democrats around the country how to fight—and win.

In his undaunted, unafraid, unparalleled effort to thwart Trump’s election chicanery, he has earned the appreciation of his party and of pro-democracy forces from coast to coast. We salute him—and the courageous victors throughout the country on Tuesday—who reminded us that the fight for democracy is not lost. If Democrats win back the House majority in 2026, Newsom will enjoy a large share of the credit.

Share

I would be remiss if I did not mention yesterday’s announcement about Nancy Pelosi’s retirement. Her love letter to San Francisco announcing she would not run for re-election reminds us of her devotion to her adopted city, which she has represented so ably for decades. Since her announcement, I have talked about her legacy with two veteran reporters, Lynn Sweet and Susan Page, in addition to hearing reflections on the Speaker Emerita from her former comms director, Ashley Etienne. Mayor of Oakland Barbara Lee joined the inimitable April Ryan on The Contrarian to extol Pelosi’s legacy of tough love on this yesterday’s episode of “The Tea.” 

The Contrarian will have much more to say about this political giant, among the most powerful female politicians in history and one of our greatest speakers of the House. For now, we can say unequivocally that no one better personifies the title of “Undaunted” than the woman who delivered the Affordable Care Act, saved the ACA, passed the rescue bill to spare the economy in 2008, championed human rights and AIDS patients, fought tirelessly for LGBTQ+ and women’s rights, defended the Capitol during Jan. 6, insisted on remaining there to finish certifying the electoral college and assuring Biden’s passage to the presidency, assembled the bipartisan Jan. 6 commission, shepherded through (on the narrowest of margins) President Biden’s remarkable domestic agenda, and time and again stood up to the odious Donald Trump. She has been an avid mentor to so many of our great leaders, including Governor Newsom. We close out our week imbued with gratitude for her service. 

Tuesday, November 4, 2025

Words & Phrases We Could Do Without

'Legal ethics' 

Donald Trump’s habitual lying has set the tone and permission structure for his regime, even for lawyers obligated to tell the truth as officers of the court. In this Justice Department, the notion that prosecutors are bound by professional obligations and must uphold something called “legal ethics” is increasingly farcical.

Courts over the last 10 months repeatedly have called out government lawyers for misrepresenting key facts. In September, the Justice Department had to confess that it widely misstated critical facts in an immigration case. “Donald Trump’s Department of Justice made a startling admission in court: It had put forth false information in its effort to secretly deport hundreds of young immigrants to Guatemala in the dead of night,” Slate reported. “DOJ lawyers had previously told a judge that the children’s parents were all clamoring for them to be sent back to Guatemala. In truth, however, not a single parent requested their child’s return, and many were not prepared to take them in if they suddenly arrived on their doorstep.”

a golden scale with an eagle on top of it
Photo by Nellie Adamyan

More recently, in the Portland case involving deployment of troops, the government had to retract an outrageous claim. “[I]t is undisputed that nearly a quarter of the agency’s entire FPS capacity had to be redirected over a relatively short period to a single location in one medium-sized American city due to the unrest there.” The government had to admit in a letter to the courtthat only “13.1 percent of the agency’s inspectors had to be redirected to Portland during the period discussed.”

These are hardly isolated cases. Just Security’s tracker reveals that judges in over 40 cases have found reason to “distrust…government information and representations.” 1/10th of that number would have drawn outrage and grave concern in any previous administration. But under this president, “courts have identified serious defects in the government’s explanations and representations—pretextual rationales (including retaliatory motives masked by pretext), false sworn statements, contradictions with the record, refusals or inability to answer basic questions, and litigation-driven ‘contrivances’—prompting judges to discount government submissions, compel expedited discovery, and withhold the presumption.”

Sadly, this is nothing new for MAGA lawyers too ambitious and unprincipled to defy Trump’s unconstitutional whims. A long list of lawyers were disbarred or otherwise punished in Trump’s first term for violating ethical obligations that should have restrained them from enabling an attempted coup in 2020. Bar associations exacted punishment for peddling the Big Lie and concocting bogus legal arguments to justify an unconstitutional scheme.

Courts can and should take corrective action in Trump 2.0. Granted, they have their hands full restraining a tyrannical executive, but they cannot let serial ethics violations go unaddressed. First, regardless of whether the opposing side files a motion, judges must demand lawyers explain how lies were presented to the court under penalty of perjury and sanction those responsible—before referring matters to state bar associations (more on that in a moment). Second, as we, along with other commentators have stressed, the presumption of regularity must be suspended for a regime that lies compulsively. The Trump regime deserves no presumption of good faith (e.g., in vindictive prosecutions, or in determination of a “rebellion” for troop deployment).

Lawyers’ ethical lapses have not, sadly, been confined to lying. Recall that a batch of big law firms have knuckled under to Trump in signing agreements that bind them to change hiring practices and pledge to do MAGA-approved pro bono work. However, last week the D.C. Bar took a critical step to deter this conduct that might compel spineless firms to reconsider their approach. As Charlie Savage reported for the New York Times: 

Months after law firms made deals with President Trump to ward off punitive executive orders, the ethics committee of the District of Columbia Bar is warning that such arrangements may require firms to drop or obtain waivers from all clients who have interests at odds with the government.”

The DC Bar’s ethics committee further advised lawyers that “such arrangements may require firms to drop or obtain waivers from all clients who have interests at odds with the government.” 

Oops.

The Bar cautioned that the deals could “amount to improper restrictions on the lawyers’ right to practice or interfere with their professional independence,” by forcing firms to take certain clients. Moreover, “if a firm that made a deal with the government and is trying to stay in the government’s good graces but also represents a client whose position is contrary to any of the government’s programs or policies, the deal would call into question whether the firm might pull its punches instead of zealously advocating its client’s interests.” Moreover, the Bar explained, a waiver is only effective if the client(s) know exactly what the firm’s deal with Trump entailed, something the firms themselves seem hard-pressed to explain.

That sort of aggressive enforcement of legal ethics should apply in cases in which government attorneys have misled courts, attacked and demeaned judges, sidestepped court orders, or defended blatantly capricious actions. Just Security, for example, documented “20 cases in which courts have found the Executive in noncompliance with judicial orders—ranging from willful disobedience and rebranding of enjoined conduct to flagrantly slow-walking compliance, missing or ignoring court-imposed deadlines, and refusing to provide court-ordered information—often prompting show-cause orders and contempt warnings.” Bar associations should investigate each documented offense to determine if ethical violations have occurred by the lawyers appearing in court and/or by their superiors.

If “legal ethics” has become an oxymoron, we are in deep trouble. And so long as they are routinely disregarded, the phrase is a hollow slogan. It need not be this way.

Justice Department attorneys’ ethical misconduct has become far too common. Absent real consequences, the transgressions will multiply. Without the legal profession’s self-policing, the most egregious illegalities of the Trump regime will pile up. Since judges cannot do all the heavy-lifting, lawyers themselves must stand up for the rule of law, lest the latter becomes an empty vessel subject to the urges of a dictator.

The Contrarian is reader-supported. Join our community as a free or paid subscriber to encourage both independent journalism and vigorous litigation against the Trump chaos regime.