A Variation to Wednesday Walk

 

Setting out on Wednesday at 10 am.  Chilly morning again.  Here's my road heading out of the Flat.

The old double wide is still in the field but ...

the new double wide is up on the hill where the old one used to live.

The variation today was to take the road to the left.  It's at the first rise and

it's all uphill.  I figure it's a good way to condition myself for climbing the Acropolis in Athens in April.

Taking a breather and looking back down the way I came. When the going is steep I tack, zig zagging like a sailboat up the hill.

Only a few houses on this road but a real climb.  I feel it in my lungs.

A shade stop because I'm getting warm.

Ok, time to turn around.  My walking time had to be shortened today because we were scheduled to get our flu and covid vaccines at noon.

Going down is harder on the knees.  Next time I'll bring my hiking stick because I had to watch my foot placement so I didn't slip on the rocky surface.

A closer look at the new double wide on my return.  The two sides are not attached yet and I have to wonder what happens to the tires.

It's placement will give the tenants the best view.

What colors I see are muted.  When I look closer the trees' leaves are just shriveling up and dropping. Our lack of rain is taking a toll on the fall colors.

Heading home.

***

I got a shot in each arm.  I took ibuprophen beforehand.  Don't know if that will help the soreness or not. I'll let you know.

Who has gotten their covid and flu shots?

From the Contrarian

Even Federal Court Judges Know the MAGA Justices are Out of Control

The Roberts Court makes obvious the need for serious reform

JENNIFER RUBIN SEP 8

READ IN APP

Lower court federal judges appointed by presidents of both parties have demonstrated admirable spine in knocking down Donald Trump’s grossly unconstitutional moves. Moreover, they have educated the public by candidly rebuking the government for misleading courts, evading their rulings, and attacking the judicial branch.

The Contemplation of Justice sits on the west side of the United States Supreme Court building

Just last week, federal judges struck down Trump’s attempts to extort Harvard (by trampling on its First Amendment rights), deploy national guard troops for civilian law enforcement, and invoke the Alien Enemies Act to justify summarily deporting immigrants. To top it off, a district court in San Francisco held that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem illegally suspended temporary status for more than 600,000 Venezuelans and Haitians.

Moreover, we saw a batch of federal judges openly slam the Supreme Court, which has repeatedly overturned lower courts’ orders (which have temporarily impeded Trump’s constitutional arson) without full argument and briefing via the so-called shadow docket. In an unprecedented display of frustration and anger, nearly a dozen federal court judges (appointees of both Democratic and Republican presidents including Trump) went to NBC News with their complaints:

Lower court judges are handed contentious cases involving the Trump administration. They painstakingly research the law to reach their rulings. When they go against Trump, administration officials and allies criticize the judges in harsh terms. The government appeals to the Supreme Court, with its 6-3 conservative majority.

And then the Supreme Court, in emergency rulings, swiftly rejects the judges’ decisions with little to no explanation.

Even more telling, the lower court judges accused the justices of enabling Trump’s attacks on the judiciary. Instead of reasoned Supreme Court opinions, they get terse per curiam opinions that suggest “they did shoddy work and are biased against Trump.” Detailing the threats lower court judges now face, they pointed the finger at Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. and the rest of the MAGA majority. One judge argued that the Supreme Court “is effectively assisting the Trump administration in ‘undermining the lower courts,’ leaving district and appeals court judges ‘thrown under the bus.’” Worse, with one exception, Roberts has remained mum while Trump threatens, insults, and smears judges who rule against him.

Perhaps this sort of open revolt from lower court judges will break through the veil of arrogance that seems to insulate Roberts and the other MAGA rubber-stampers from entirely justified criticism. The majority’s anti-textual decisions (most vividly, the sweeping grant of criminal immunity to the president and destruction of voting rights statutes) have distorted the Framers’ constitutional vision.

Subscribed

In Trump 2.0, the MAGA justices repeatedly have manipulated the “emergency docket” to effectively green light one Trump executive power grab after another, without regard to findings of fact below or the extreme harm inflicted on plaintiffs (e.g., NIH grantees, public employee unions). In doing so they have diminished the authority of lower federal judges and left them exposed to threats and smears, as the lower court judges attested.

Like an abusive spouse, Justice Neil Gorsuch has tried to make the lower courts into the bad guys. Supreme Court legal expert Steve Vladeckrecounted that in a recent opinion, Gorsuch “accused the lower courts in [three cases] of open defiance of earlier rulings by the Supreme Court on emergency applications.” Vladeck explained, “More than that, Gorsuch claimed that the Court’s interventions in many of the Trump cases would be ‘unnecessary’ but for bad behavior by lower courts.”

Vladeck blasted this outrageous accusation:

It would be one thing if Gorsuch had incontrovertible evidence of lower-court defiance. But….the opposite is true. Instead, the real culprit here is the Supreme Court’s own majority, which continues to hand down thinly (or entirely un-explained rulings in these cases and expect lower-court judges to read their minds in the face of entirely reasonable arguments for distinguishing the earlier rulings.

The Court may have the raw power to act that way. But to then criticize lower-court judges—who, unlike the justices, are moving heaven and earth to provide lengthy, written rationales of their decisions—is not just profoundly disrespectful; it is further enabling an increasingly loud (and increasingly dangerous) anti-judiciary narrative on the right….

The lower court judges who spoke to NBC News agreed with Vladeck’s view. Frankly, Gorsuch’s obnoxious bullying only underscores their complaints that the MAGA justices are out of control.

This intra-judicial fight is just the latest installment in the MAGA justices’ record of misbehavior and overreach. It is no surprise that the court’s approval has plummeted. Whether it is receipt of lavish gifts (along with inexcusable disclosure lapses), refusal to accept mandatory ethics rules, utter disregard of precedent to super-charge the extreme right-wing agenda, systematic destruction of voting rights, or nasty partisan attacks on critics, the Roberts Court no longer resembles a panel of dispassionate jurists.

But MAGA justices apparently wrongly assume they are beyond reproach. In fact, Congress controls their jurisdiction, composition, and even the length of their terms, many legal experts argue.

Share

The Constitution states:

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

Congress could, for example, entirely do away with its appellate jurisdiction. An en banc panel of the D.C. Circuit Court could be designated as the highest court for appellate review. A lesser step would be to allow appellate review only of final opinions, thereby eliminating the emergency docket as a means of lifting temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions.

Other reform measures such as a mandatory ethics code and term limits already garner overwhelming bipartisan approval. And should the court continue its unprincipled, partisan crusade and/or strike down more mild restrictions, public support to expand the court to 13 members (matching the number of circuits) would likely soar.

Given the unconscionable conduct of the current Supreme Court, a course correction is long overdue. Having lost legitimacy in the eyes of the American people and even in the eyes on lower court judges, they risk a serious backlash if the MAGA majority continues to abuse the emergency docket, slander lower courts, violate ethical norms, egregiously ignore precedent, and facilitate Trump’s quest for dictatorial control. A toothless “Supreme” Court with very limited jurisdiction and term limits would be quite a legacy for Roberts, the self-described “institutionalist.”

The Contrarian is reader-supported. To receive new posts and assist with our work in the court of law and the court of public opinion, consider joining our community as a free or paid subscriber.

 

A Wonderful Interlude

A harp concert in a lovely garden setting.

Sunday afternoon I attended this concert courtesy of two members of our garden club.  The harpist, Pam, donated "2 hours of harp music to the event of one's choice" to the garden club raffle at the fair in August. Our club president, Peggy, had her ticket picked (I was doing the picking) and once she heard that she'd won this prize. one of many others that were offered, she said she'd host it in her garden for the garden club members.

Peggy has had a garden for years that she opened to "pick your own flowers" and tea parties.  She closed it down a couple of years ago because of the work involved.  Her partner keeps the paths mown but the hydrangeas and bushes are huge and no more annuals planted.  The tea house is still there though, so we had tea and carried it to the deck/stage where Pam played for us.

Not sure where Peggy got all the chairs from, but she did rent a port a potty for the weekend.  Below is the tea house.

Here's Peggy!

It was a cool afternoon. One person even brought a blanket to put over her legs.

Peggy got a quick lesson from Pam.

The stage was well decorated from the garden.

Pam is a therapeutic harpist.  She plays at the Dartmouth Hospital for patients being treated with infusions.

Her music is a mixture of Celtic, folk and rock.  She had no music and played all from memory.  She took requests as she does at the hospital.

Here's the inside of the tea house an eclectic mixture of treasures.

We are up on top of the first mountain east of the Connecticut River in NH.  The view is spectacular.

Below is where the annuals were planted and now a chaotic mixture of perennials gone wild and annuals self seeded.

Here are some shortened recordings of Pam playing.  My original recordings were too big to put in here so I shortened them.

The sun was mostly behind clouds for the concert until Pam played Here Comes the Sun and it sure enough came out then.

A lovely time was had by all.

*****

Here is my post from August 2021 when Emily, granddaughters and I visited the Garden for tea and flower picking.  It was likely the last year it was open for this.

Many more photos of how lovely this garden once was.

Americans of Conscience Checklist - consider subscribing. It's free.

 

We create a
stronger democracy,
thriving planet,
and equality for all—

one action at a time.

Join 44632 Americans speaking up for a better future.

Sign up for the Americans of Conscience Checklist!

Email(Required)

Who should subscribe?

Anyone who wants to act on their values but isn’t quite sure where to start.

-Samantha W., RI

---

I am participating in a growing community of people who are acting on issues, not on partisan hype or sensationalized clickbait. The checklist works against divisiveness by focusing on values, not personalities or parties.

-Susan L., MN

Subscribe now to get started:

Email(Required)

What’s in the Americans of Conscience Checklist?

Action: Clear, concise actions every other week to:

• Ensure that democracy thrives
• Ensure that Americans enjoy abundant liberties
• Ensure that Earth gets cooler and greener

Encouragement: Lists of good news from around the country:

• Celebrating progress for democratic norms
• Celebrating wins for justice and equity
• Celebrating strides toward a thriving planet

What’s not in the Checklist?

We leave antagonism at the door:

• No partisan name-calling or insults.
• No vilifying.
• No conspiracy theories.
• No scary hype.

The U.S. is already burdened by polarization; our publication strives not to add to it.

Let’s get to work — together.

Subscribe now:

Email(Required)

What our subscribers say:

The AoC Checklist provides me unbiased coverage of current events, easy, clear actions I can take for the causes I believe in, and lists of good news stories so I can feel like the work I am doing matters.

• Joan G., CA

The Checklist provides excellent information that I can act on about issues, messages, and people to contact. I especially appreciate AoCC’s positive approach, focusing on what we support or oppose, and avoiding inflammatory and divisive language. Bottom line, being active with AoCC keeps me hopeful.

-Chris D., NY

The AoC Checklist helps me feel empowered, informed, and engaged.

• Rebecca G., CA

Using the Checklist makes me feel like I have a voice, like I am making a difference, and like what I’m doing matters.

– Meagan D., ME

The AoC Checklist makes advocacy less intimidating: it includes specific action steps, scripts, and links for more information. It also helps me stay positive through the process.

– Brooklyn W., KS

It’s easy these days to feel hopeless, but the AoC Checklist is like a guidepost showing you paths forward and cheering you on.

– Lindsay J., IA

Subscribe now and start working alongside

44632 Americans of Conscience like you:

Email(Required)

The AoC checklist is the best way I have of coping with the news I hear;
instead of feeling defeated, I take action.

– Kelly R., OR